Translate

Thursday, November 5, 2015

Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement - Full Text Doxument Released


What Is the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP)?
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a secretive, multinational trade agreement that threatens to extend restrictive intellectual property (IP) laws across the globe and rewrite international rules on its enforcement. The main problems are two-fold:


(1) Intellectual Property Chapter: Leaked draft texts of the agreement show that the IP chapter would have extensive negative ramifications for users’ freedom of expression, right to privacy and due process, and hinder peoples' abilities to innovate.

(2) Lack of Transparency: The entire process has shut out multi-stakeholder participation and is shrouded in secrecy. 

TTIP or The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership are a series of secret trade negotiations between the EU and USA. TTIP is concerned with reducing the regulation for the already powerful corporations on issues like- food safety law, environmental restrictions and banking regulations.


Julian Assange, WikiLeaks editor said:

 “The TPP has developed in secret an unaccountable supranational court for multinationals to sue states. This system is a challenge to parliamentary and judicial sovereignty. Similar tribunals have already been shown to chill the adoption of sane environmental protection, public health and public transport policies.”

The twelve nations currently negotiating the TPP are the U.S., Japan, Australia, Peru, Malaysia, Vietnam, New Zealand, Chile, Singapore, Canada, Mexico, and Brunei Darussalam. The TPP contains a chapter on intellectual property covering copyright, trademarks, and patents. 

The agreement had previously never been officially released to the public, except from leaked documents, unril today, 5 November 2015, the website of New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade released the massive, full text of the ostensibly secretive Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).

In October, WikiLeaks claimed that they had a leaked copy of the full text and it contained information on trade secrets and top-down control of the Internet that are indeed found in chapter 18.

At the bottom there is a link to a zip file containing all chapters or one can read and save each chapter PDF individually. The lengthy text contains a lot of business newspeak. However, various chapters deal with history’s biggest free trade move yet, pharmaceutical industries, business conduct in third-world and developing countries, agriculture, state-owned enterprises and designated monopolies (interesting terminology), government procurement, competition policies, and e-commerce.


The TPP Will Rewrite Global Rules on Intellectual Property Enforcement
  All signatory countries will be required to conform their domestic laws and policies to the provisions of the Agreement. In the U.S., this is likely to further entrench controversial aspects of U.S. copyright law (such as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act [DMCA]) and restrict the ability of Congress to engage in domestic law reform to meet the evolving IP needs of American citizens and the innovative technology sector. The recently leaked U.S.-proposed IP chapter also includes provisions that appear to go beyond current U.S. law. 


  

The leaked U.S. IP chapter includes many detailed requirements that are more restrictive than current international standards, and would require significant changes to other countries’ copyright laws. These include obligations for countries to: 

Expand Copyright Terms: Create copyright terms well beyond the internationally agreed period in the 1994 Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). The TPP could extend copyright term protections from life of the author + 50 years, to Life + 70 years for works created by individuals, and either 95 years after publication or 120 years after creation for corporate owned works (such as Mickey Mouse).

Escalate Protections for DRM (aka Digital Locks): It will compel signatory nations to enact laws banning circumvention of digital locks (technological protection measures or TPMs) [PDF] that mirror the DMCA and treat violation of the TPM provisions as a separate offense even when no copyright infringement is involved. This would require countries like New Zealand to completely rewrite its innovative 2008 copyright law, as well as override 

Australia’s carefully-crafted 2007 TPM regime exclusions for region-coding on movies on DVDs, video games, and players, and for embedded software in devices that restrict access to goods and services for the device—a thoughtful effort by Australian policy makers to avoid the pitfalls experienced with the US digital locks provisions. 

In the U.S., business competitors have used the DMCA to try to block printer cartridge refill services, competing garage door openers, and to lock mobile phones to particular network providers.

Create New Threats for Journalists and Whistleblowers: Dangerously vague text on the misuse of trade secrets, which could be used to enact harsh criminal punishments against anyone who reveals or even accesses information through a "computer system" that is allegedly confidential.

Enact a "Three-Step Test" Language That Puts Restrictions on Fair Use: The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) is putting fair use at risk with restrictive language in the TPP's IP chapter. U.S. and Australia have proposed very restrictive text, while other countries such as Chile, New Zealand, and Malaysia, have proposed more flexible, user-friendly terms.

Place Greater Liability on Internet Intermediaries: The TPP would force the adoption of the U.S. DMCA Internet intermediaries copyright safe harbor regime in its entirety. For example, this would require Chile to rewrite its forward-looking 2010 copyright law that currently establishes a judicial notice-and-takedown regime, which provides greater protection to Internet users’ expression and privacy than the DMCA.

Adopt Heavy Criminal Sanctions: Adopt criminal sanctions for copyright infringement that is done without a commercial motivation. Users could be jailed or hit with debilitating fines over file sharing, and may have their property or domains seized even without a formal complaint from the copyright holder.

In short, countries would have to abandon any efforts to learn from the mistakes of the United States and its experience with the DMCA over the last 16 years, and adopt many of the most controversial aspects of U.S. copyright law in their entirety. 

At the same time, the TPP's IP chapter does not export the limitations and exceptions in the U.S. copyright regime like fair use, which have enabled freedom of expression and technological innovation to flourish in the United States. It includes only a placeholder for exceptions and limitations. 

This raises serious concerns about other countries’ sovereignty and the ability of national governments to set laws and policies to meet their domestic priorities.

Environment and food safety

TTIP plans to bring the European food standard in line with those of America.US regulations are far more lenient and a lot more damaging to our health.

A recent report from the Center for International Environmental Law (Ciel) argues that the European chemical industry wants the US system of chemical risk assessment to be adopted, which the group says would allow the use of over 80 pesticides currently banned in the EU. Other campaigners say US biotech companies want to use TTIP to open EU borders to imports of genetically modified food.

The European regulations are far tougher on potentially dangerous substances, where a company must prove a substance to be safe before it is approved for use. The US has the opposite attitude where any substance can be used until it is proven to be dangerous.

An example- There are 1,200 substances banned from use in cosmetics, compared to just 12 in the US.

Why You Should Care

TPP raises significant concerns about citizens’ freedom of expression, due process, innovation, the future of the Internet’s global infrastructure, and the right of sovereign nations to develop policies and laws that best meet their domestic priorities. In sum, the TPP puts at risk some of the most fundamental rights that enable access to knowledge for the world’s citizens.

The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) is pursuing a TPP agreement that will require signatory counties to adopt heightened copyright protection that advances the agenda of the U.S. entertainment and pharmaceutical industries agendas, but omits the flexibilities and exceptions that protect Internet users and technology innovators.

The TPP will affect countries beyond the 12 that are currently involved in negotiations. Like ACTA, the TPP Agreement is a plurilateral agreement that will be used to create new heightened global IP enforcement norms. 

Countries that are not parties to the negotiation will likely be asked to accede to the TPP as a condition of bilateral trade agreements with the U.S. and other TPP members, or evaluated against the TPP's copyright enforcement standards in the USTR's annual Special 301 process.

Treaties and International Law – Text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership

The text of the Agreement was released by TPP Parties on 5 November 2015 and can be accessed by chapter below.



  • 3. Rules of Origin and Origin Procedures [PDF, 155KB]
  • 4. Textiles and Apparel [PDF, 70KB]
  • 5. Customs Administration and Trade Facilitation [PDF, 59KB]

  • 6. Trade Remedies [PDF, 52KB]
      • The Chapter includes the following Annex:
              • Annex 6-A: Practices Relating to Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings
  • 7. Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures [PDF, 92KB]

  • 8. Technical Barriers to Trade [PDF, 198KB]

      • The Chapter includes the following Annexes:
              • Annex 8-A: Wine and Distilled Spirits
              • Annex 8-B: Information and Communications Technology Products
              • Annex 8-C: Pharmaceuticals
              • Annex 8-D: Cosmetics
              • Annex 8-E: Medical Devices
              • Annex 8-F: Proprietary Formulas for Pre-packaged Foods and Food Additives
              • Annex 8-G: Organic Products
  • 9. Investment [PDF, 262KB]
      • This Chapter includes the following Annexes:
              • Annex 9-A: Customary International Law
              • Annex 9-B: Expropriation
              • Annex 9-C: Expropriation Relating to Land
              • Annex 9-D: Service of Documents on a Party Under Section B (Investor State Dispute Settlement)
              • Annex 9-E: Transfers
              • Annex 9-F: DL-600
              • Annex 9-G: Public Debt
              • Annex 9-H
              • Annex 9-I: Non-Conforming Measures Ratchet Mechanism
              • Annex 9-J: Submission of a Claim to Arbitration
              • Annex 9-K: Submission of Certain Claims for Three Years After Entry into Force
              • Annex 9-L: Investment Agreements
      • Drafters’ Note on Interpretation of In Like Circumstances [PDF, 43KB]
  • 10. Cross-Border Trade in Services [PDF, 126KB]
      • The Chapter includes the following Annexes:
              • Annex 10-A: Professional Services
              • Annex 10-B: Express Delivery Services
              • Annex 10-C: Non-Conforming Measures Ratchet Mechanism

      • See the country-specific Annexes to the Agreement

  • 11. Financial Services [PDF, 251KB]
        • This Chapter includes the following Annexes:
                • Annex 11-A: Cross-Border Trade
                • Annex 11-B: Specific Commitments
                • Annex 11-C: Non-Conforming Measures Ratchet Mechanism
                • Annex 11-D: Authorities Responsible For Financial Services
                • Annex 11-E

  • 12. Temporary Entry for Business Persons [PDF, 43KB]
  • 13. Telecommunications [PDF, 125KB]
      • This Chapter includes the following Annexes:
              • Annex 13-A: Rural Telephone Suppliers – United States
              • Annex 13-B: Rural Telephone Suppliers – Peru

    • Zip file of all 30 Chapters (excluding Annexes) [ZIP, 3.15MB]


    What You Can Do

    Are you in the United States?

    Submit your ideas for protest slogans for us to use on signs when we join a large, diverse coalition of organizations in demonstrations against the TPP in Washington DC next month.

    More new actions are coming soon. In the meantime, get in touch with your lawmakers and call on them to speak out against this secret trade agreement that threatens our rights online.

    For more information on other problematic aspects of the TPP, visit Public Citizen’s resource page.


    Local Actions Around the World 

    If you're in Canada, you can use the Council of Canadians' tool to send a message to your international trade minister and members of the parliamentary trade committee to release the secret TPP text and negotiate the deal with proper public input.

    If you're in Australia, you can use GetUp!'s action too to contact your senator and call on them to oppose the agreement in the Senate.

    Si estas en Chile, unete a la campaña promovida por la ONG Derechos Digitales y di NO al TPP!

    Si estas en Peru, contacta lo más pronto posible a los bloggeros que se oponen al TPP y a las organizaciones que reclaman transparencia!

    日本に住んでいる方には、Stop TPP!! ウェブページでご案内できますし、Stop TPPのT−シャツを買う事もできます。
    http://truththeory.com/

    Information was compiled from these excellent truth sites:

    https://www.eff.org 
    The Electronic Frontier Foundation is the leading nonprofit organization defending civil liberties in the digital world. Founded in 1990, EFF champions user privacy, free expression, and innovation through impact litigation, policy analysis, grassroots activism, and technology development. We work to ensure that rights and freedoms are enhanced and protected as our use of technology grows.

    http://www.activistpost.com


    http://truththeory.com/ 
    We created Truth Theory because we wanted to find an easy way to bring thought-provoking, educational, and entertaining material to anyone with an Internet connection.  We believe that the mainstream media increasingly practices self-censorship, is manipulated and often, ignores many opinions and historical events.  With the media distorting or ignoring information, it’s often very hard to get an accurate picture of a problem, even while watching the news.


    Posted by at
    Labels: